Freefall: A Reckoning For Boeing May Miss Critical 24 Year Certification Failure, Says Aerospace Expert Daryl Guberman

LOS ANGELES - EntSun -- Aerospace quality‑systems expert and Boeing shareholder Daryl Guberman is urging filmmaker Rory Kennedy and Moxie Films to contact him regarding their upcoming Boeing documentary, warning that the film is missing the most important structural failure in modern aviation oversight: Boeing has not held AS9100 certification for 24 years, despite requiring it from every supplier. In April 17,2024 under penalty of ejection or arrest Guberman made known Boeing's 22 year disregard for internal supplier audits via April & July 2002 Bulletins Boeing issued. https://www.newstribune.com/photos/2024/apr/18/3749044/

According to Guberman, the turning point came in April & July 2002, when Boeing mandated that all suppliers be NADCAP- National Aerospace and Defense Contractors Accreditation Program (Heat treatment, welding flight critical processes & AS9100‑certified under the American National Accreditation Board (ANAB) — while Boeing itself held no AS9100 certification at all for over 24 years (Boeing stipulated in bulletins send in your certification- parts and Boeing would visit only if need be or need arises) . This mandate was enforced through Boeing's supplier‑control system and tied directly to accreditation structures later implicated in federal fraud, including U.S. Department of State Contract DOS 19AQMM18R0131.

Boeing International Film: "The Shields Of Death – Exposing Decades Of Uncertified Corruption"https://youtu.be/zweWbsIGc7o



Federal Contract Records Reveal ANAB's 14 Year Accreditation Identity Breakdown: DOS 19AQMM18R0131 (2018) and DOJ 15F06725C0000139 (2025) https://www.prlog.org/13142907-federal-contract-records-reveal-anabs-14-year-accreditation-identity-breakdown-dos-19aqmm18r0131-2018-and-doj-15f06725c0000139-2025.html

"This is the root cause no one has touched," Guberman said. "Every whistleblower so far has described symptoms — not the disease. The disease is the collapse of the aerospace certification system."

More on EntSun News

• When the Coroner's Report Isn't Enough: Colorado Families Turn to Private Autopsy for Closure
• MetroLagoons announces Labor Day Bash Sept. 5-7
• Slipaway Food Truck Park & Marina to host weekly mat Pilates classes
• Nearly One-Third of CRE Asset Managers Make Major Capital Decisions on Gut Instinct, New Survey Finds
• RemoteBridge Names Dr. John N. Just, Ed.D. Chief Executive Officer

THE INDUSTRIAL CONTROL STRUCTURE THAT SUPERSEDED FAA OVERSIGHT

In the early 2000s, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, and Airbus formed what became the Industrial Controlled Other Party (ICOP) structure — a private governance system that effectively superseded FAA oversight.

Guberman explains:

• ICOP dictated supplier certification requirements
• ICOP controlled accreditation bodies
• ICOP influenced global aerospace quality rules
• ICOP operated outside FAA regulatory authority

This structure allowed Boeing to control the oversight system that was supposed to regulate it.

Guberman notes that the FAA sits on the ANSI–ANAB board, alongside Boeing and Lockheed representatives — a conflict that has never been publicly addressed.

"This is why the FAA never questioned Boeing's missing AS9100 certification," Guberman said. "They were sitting at the same table."

THE ELIZABETH LUND CONTRADICTION

On June 27, 2024, Boeing executive Elizabeth Lund stated publicly that Boeing was:

• "prepared to get AS9100,"
• "compliant to the standard," and
• "doing internal audits as if they were certified."

https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/boeing-brief-european-regulators-production-090603535.html ( Last paragraph in this article "willing and prepared")

Guberman's investigation shows these statements were not accurate.

OCTOBER 2024: GUBERMAN GOES TO BOEING FACILITIES

In October 2024, Guberman traveled to Boeing's major Washington State sites — Everett, Renton, Auburn, and Northfield — to verify Lund's claims.

What he found was stark:

• No employees knew what AS9100 was
• No internal audits were being performed
• No audit trail existed
• Employees were discouraged from attending safety meetings because "the plane had to be moved to the next station"

GUBERMAN DISCOVERY:https://guberman-quality.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/GUBERMAN-DISCOVERY-2026.pdf

GUBERMAN: BOEING UNDER THE LENS-THE GUBERMAN INSIGHT: https://guberman-quality.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/BOEING-UNDER-THE-LENS-2026-BOOKLET.pdf

"These findings directly contradict Boeing's public statements," Guberman said. "You cannot be compliant to AS9100 if you do not perform internal audits. That is the backbone of the standard."

More on EntSun News

• Project CIVICA Report Finds 10,680 Non-Citizen Indicators on New York Voter Rolls — Including 88 Records with Recent Voting History
• New Analysis Details Three Converging Forces in AI and Workforce Policy Behind a $37 Billion GDP Reduction
• Revenue Optics Launches Pricing and Revenue Growth Management Practice, Names Shafohi Alamgir Vice President
• Popular AI planner Voiset launches version 2.0 and enters MENA at LEAP 2026 with full Arabic support
• CasaPerks and CredHub Partner to Help the Multifamily Industry Strengthen Resident Activation Through Credit-Building Rewards

HOW GOOD PARTS BECOME JUNK IN AN UNCERTIFIED ENVIRONMENT

Guberman explains that when a supplier produces a part under accredited AS9100 controls, that part is valid only if it enters an aircraft built under the same accredited system.

If Boeing itself is not certified:

• The part loses its chain of custody
• The part loses its quality pedigree
• The part cannot be validated
• The part becomes junk, even if manufactured perfectly

He cites the Boeing 787 toggle‑switch failure involved in the 2025 India crash as an example of how a single component — produced correctly — can still fail when installed into an aircraft built in a non‑certified, non‑audited environment.

"This is not hypothetical," Guberman said. "This is what happens when the prime manufacturer abandons the standard but forces it on everyone else."

THE 2018–PRESENT RISK WINDOW

In 2018, Boeing escalated the problem, by continuing  forcing all suppliers to keep using ANAB, an accreditation body even though it was shown to have committed fraud being recognized as an "underwriter" on a U.S. State Department contract — including DOS 19AQMM18R0131.

Guberman's findings:  all certifications issued under ANAB (American National Accreditation Board) and its international equivalents operating under the Multi Regional Agreement (MRA) and Multilateral Agreement (MLA) structures are unreliable from 2018 to the present. MRA-MLA are equivalent to ANSI-ANAB accreditation. ANSI-American National Standards Institute, took over complete ownership in 2014  but did not announce this till 2018: https://www.prlog.org/13134636-worldwide-recall-warning-anab-and-mramla-certification-failures-threaten-aerospacedefense-cybersecurity-medical-devices-and-global-supply-chain.html

This means:

• Materials
• Processes
• Composites
• Titanium
• Aluminum
• Fasteners
• Electrical components
• Software‑controlled parts

…may have been produced under unverifiable accreditation, then installed into aircraft built under no AS9100 oversight at Boeing.

"There is no waiver, no exception, and no administrative workaround when the foundation itself is uncertified or fraudulent," Guberman said.

WHY MOXIE FILMS MUST INCLUDE THIS

Guberman warns that if the documentary excludes the certification collapse, it will miss the root cause of Boeing's decline.

"Pilot training, MCAS, and culture are symptoms," he said. "The certification collapse is the disease. If Moxie Films wants the truth, they need to call me. 203 556 1493"

https://guberman-quality.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/GUBERMAN-ANOMALY-FEBRUARY-2026.docx.pdf

CLOSING STATEMENT

"All who rise while burying the truth will one day be buried by it."

— Anonymous (proverbial wisdom)