Popular on EntSun
- Female Motorsports Sponsorship & Expansion; Acquisition Agreement of UAE-Based Sports Incubator by Online Lottery & Sports Game Provider: Lottery.com - 244
- IRF Builders Forum Brings Global Leaders to Washington, D.C. to Advance Religious Freedom Through Cooperative Engagement - 208
- BillBoards Inc. Hits the Road with God Bless America Tour and Reality Series Now Streaming on Tubi TV - 158
- Token-Operated Sake Service Opens at Tobu Nikko Station - 135
- Honoring Black History, Culture, and Community in Fall River - 133
- databahn Launches GenAI Sales Intelligence Platform to Revolutionize Fortune 500 and Global 2000 Account Research - 126
- Byrd Davis Alden & Henrichson Launches Independence Day Safe Ride Initiative with 500 Free Uber Credits - 119
- Brandi Little to Debut Powerful Soul Single "Thought It Was Love" June 27 on MoonTownTunes.com - 112
- Agreement to Supply US-Based Defense Provider with Thin-Film Solar Tech for Orbital Application; Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (N A S D A Q: ASTI) - 112
- The ITeam Ranked on Channel Partners 2025 MSP 501—Tech Industry's Most Prestigious List of Managed Service Providers Worldwide - 111
Similar on EntSun
- Santa Monica Businesses Push Back on Bus Stop Relocation That Threatens Access and Safety
- The Blue Luna Encourages Local Schools to Take Steps to Enhance Safety for Students and Staff
- Smart Resnse Unveils Smart Resnse(SRMS) Token-Powered AI Orchestration Platform to Revolutionize Multi-Billion Dollar Market
- Cover Girl Finalist Teisha Mechetti Questions Legitimacy of Inked Originals Competition, Demands Transparency
- Easton & Easton, LLP Files Suit Against The Dwelling Place Anaheim & Vineyard USA Over Abuse Allegations
- The World's Largest Green Economic Revolution Emerges as Nature, Tech, and Finance Converge
- Pyro Marketing Opens New Digital Marketing Company to Power Growth for Fitness and Ecommerce Brands
- Dr. John Salerno of Salerno Wellness Introduces Their New Full Body Capsule for Advanced LED Light Therapy Patient Treatments
- Adostics & Genmega Announce the Introduction of A-POD
- LIB and Nidec Rejoin Forces for Giant TH-0098 Temperature Humidity Test Chamber
Bisnar Chase Employment Attorneys Victorious in California Appellate Court
EntSun News/10846297
The appellate court decision is the first to address what California Labor Code Section 925 means when it says it applies to a contract that has been modified. Specifically, it looked at whether this modification must be to a forum-selection clause (which is the voidable provision addressed in Section 925) or can be to any provision of the contract.
NEWPORT BEACH, Calif. - EntSun -- Forum-selection clauses allow the parties to agree that any disputes relating to that contract will be resolved in a specific forum or court in a particular jurisdiction. Bisnar Chase attorneys Ian Silvers and Jerusalem Beligan prevailed in the appellate court, securing a favorable ruling for their client in his employment lawsuit and clarifying the law for other California employees.
The California Court of Appeal, First District Division 4, upheld a Contra Cost County trial court's decision that the plaintiff Patrick Finch, in an employment lawsuit against his former employer, had the right to file the complaint in California instead of Ohio, despite a forum selection clause in his 2014 employment contract. The trial court denied Defendant Midwest Motor Supply Company's motion to dismiss or stay the lawsuit based on the forum selection clause. Instead, it held that the forum selection clause was voidable by Mr. Finch under California Labor Code Section 925. Defendant Midwest Motor Supply Co sought writ relief in the California Court of Appeal from that trial court order.
Midwest Motor Supply Co. argued that the action should be dismissed or stayed because Finch was required under the forum-selection clause in his 2014 employment contract to litigate his lawsuit in Franklin County, Ohio. However, the trial court held that Finch's 2017 and 2018 Compensation and Annual Plan letters modified the 2014 employment agreement that contained the forum-selection clause. Because these changes were made after Jan. 1, 2017, the court concluded that they triggered Finch's right under Section 925 of the California Labor Code to void the forum selection clause.
More on EntSun News
Section 925 states that an employer shall not require an employee who primarily resides and works in California, as a condition of employment, to agree to a provision that would require the employee to adjudicate outside of California a claim arising in California or deprive the employee of the protections offered by California law with respect to a controversy that arises in California. Section 925 applies to a contract entered into, modified or extended on or after Jan. 1, 2017. If Section 925 applies, the forum-selection clause is voidable by the employee. The issue at the center of the writ was what the statute means by a contract "modified". Defendant argued that it meant only a modification to the forum selection clause, while Plaintiff's position was that it meant a modification to any provision of the contract (which is consistent with the trial court ruling). Prior to this case, no appellate court had addressed what modified meant in terms of Section 925. The Appellate Court upheld the trial court's decision, affirmed that modification means any modification to the contract and rejected claims that such a holding would violate the Contracts Clause in the U.S. and California Constitutions.
Silvers and Beligan proved their deep knowledge of federal and state employment laws by prevailing in this case, said Brian Chase, senior partner at Bisnar Chase.
"Our employment lawyers go the extra mile when it comes to fighting hard to protect the rights of our clients," he said. "This was a precedent-setting, groundbreaking, first-ever decision of its kind from the appellate court. I'm proud of the time and commitment our team has poured into this case. The results are telling."
Silvers said this decision is significant because, as stated by the appellate court itself, that this was the first time an appellate court had even addressed this issue of what the statute meant by modified.
More on EntSun News
"This is significant because the appellate court held that the California Labor Section 925 is triggered when there is a modification to any provision of a contract on or after Jan. 1, 2017, and not just a modification to a forum-selection clause as argued by the Defendant," he said. "The court vindicated the plain meaning of the statute to apply to any modification to the contract."
The Appellate Court also affirmed the intent of the statute as being to provide employees based in California with a forum in California to litigate employment-related claims if the terms of his or her employment changed after Jan. 1, 2017, Silvers said. In addition, the court held that the statute is not retroactive and does not violate the Contract Clause of the U.S. and California Constitutions. Further, it held that the result of voiding the forum-selection clause does not result in a violation of the Contracts Clause because there is no substantial impairment since "the provision does not affect the substantive obligations of the contract, but only the procedures by which the parties may seek redress for violations of those obligations." Even if it had found there was a substantial impairment, the Appellate Court found that this was outweighed by the significant and legitimate public purpose of the statute.
"This victory confirms that an employer cannot make a change to any provision of a contract that contains a forum-selection clause without triggering Section 925," Silvers said. "An employer cannot get around this statute by modifying other provisions of the agreement except the forum-selection clause, and then claim that the statute does not apply." This decision is also significant because it confirmed that including modification in the statute closed this potential loophole that Defendant tried to exploit here, Silvers said.
"Hopefully this will help ensure that such forum selection clauses in California go by the wayside, as was intended by the statute."
About Bisnar Chase
Bisnar Chase represents employees' rights and those injured by defective products and acts of negligence. The firm has been featured on a number of popular media outlets including Newsweek, Fox, NBC, and ABC, and is known for its passionate pursuit of results for their clients. Since 1978, Bisnar Chase has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for victims and their families. For more information, please call 800-561-4887 or visit http://www.BestAttorney.com for a free consultation. We are located at 1301 Dove Street #120, Newport Beach, CA 92660.
The California Court of Appeal, First District Division 4, upheld a Contra Cost County trial court's decision that the plaintiff Patrick Finch, in an employment lawsuit against his former employer, had the right to file the complaint in California instead of Ohio, despite a forum selection clause in his 2014 employment contract. The trial court denied Defendant Midwest Motor Supply Company's motion to dismiss or stay the lawsuit based on the forum selection clause. Instead, it held that the forum selection clause was voidable by Mr. Finch under California Labor Code Section 925. Defendant Midwest Motor Supply Co sought writ relief in the California Court of Appeal from that trial court order.
Midwest Motor Supply Co. argued that the action should be dismissed or stayed because Finch was required under the forum-selection clause in his 2014 employment contract to litigate his lawsuit in Franklin County, Ohio. However, the trial court held that Finch's 2017 and 2018 Compensation and Annual Plan letters modified the 2014 employment agreement that contained the forum-selection clause. Because these changes were made after Jan. 1, 2017, the court concluded that they triggered Finch's right under Section 925 of the California Labor Code to void the forum selection clause.
More on EntSun News
- Smart Resnse Unveils Smart Resnse(SRMS) Token-Powered AI Orchestration Platform to Revolutionize Multi-Billion Dollar Market
- Josh and Heidi Follow Up the Much Anticipated and Successful Launch of the "Spreading the Good BUZZ" Podcast with a Personal Request
- The Battle for the Enchanted Forest Brings Fantasy, Fun, and Fundraising!
- Revolutionary Blockchain Platform Okh Finance Announces Okh Finance(OKKH) Token Launch to Transform Global Asset Leasing Market
- Cover Girl Finalist Teisha Mechetti Questions Legitimacy of Inked Originals Competition, Demands Transparency
Section 925 states that an employer shall not require an employee who primarily resides and works in California, as a condition of employment, to agree to a provision that would require the employee to adjudicate outside of California a claim arising in California or deprive the employee of the protections offered by California law with respect to a controversy that arises in California. Section 925 applies to a contract entered into, modified or extended on or after Jan. 1, 2017. If Section 925 applies, the forum-selection clause is voidable by the employee. The issue at the center of the writ was what the statute means by a contract "modified". Defendant argued that it meant only a modification to the forum selection clause, while Plaintiff's position was that it meant a modification to any provision of the contract (which is consistent with the trial court ruling). Prior to this case, no appellate court had addressed what modified meant in terms of Section 925. The Appellate Court upheld the trial court's decision, affirmed that modification means any modification to the contract and rejected claims that such a holding would violate the Contracts Clause in the U.S. and California Constitutions.
Silvers and Beligan proved their deep knowledge of federal and state employment laws by prevailing in this case, said Brian Chase, senior partner at Bisnar Chase.
"Our employment lawyers go the extra mile when it comes to fighting hard to protect the rights of our clients," he said. "This was a precedent-setting, groundbreaking, first-ever decision of its kind from the appellate court. I'm proud of the time and commitment our team has poured into this case. The results are telling."
Silvers said this decision is significant because, as stated by the appellate court itself, that this was the first time an appellate court had even addressed this issue of what the statute meant by modified.
More on EntSun News
- Easton & Easton, LLP Files Suit Against The Dwelling Place Anaheim & Vineyard USA Over Abuse Allegations
- AI Visibility: The Key to Beating Google's AI Overviews and Regaining Traffic
- Stuck Doing Math or Figuring Out Life's Numbers? Calculator.now Makes It Stupidly Simple
- Colbert Packaging Announces WBENC Recognition
- DivX Empowers Media Enthusiasts with Free Expert Guides for Advanced MP4 Management
"This is significant because the appellate court held that the California Labor Section 925 is triggered when there is a modification to any provision of a contract on or after Jan. 1, 2017, and not just a modification to a forum-selection clause as argued by the Defendant," he said. "The court vindicated the plain meaning of the statute to apply to any modification to the contract."
The Appellate Court also affirmed the intent of the statute as being to provide employees based in California with a forum in California to litigate employment-related claims if the terms of his or her employment changed after Jan. 1, 2017, Silvers said. In addition, the court held that the statute is not retroactive and does not violate the Contract Clause of the U.S. and California Constitutions. Further, it held that the result of voiding the forum-selection clause does not result in a violation of the Contracts Clause because there is no substantial impairment since "the provision does not affect the substantive obligations of the contract, but only the procedures by which the parties may seek redress for violations of those obligations." Even if it had found there was a substantial impairment, the Appellate Court found that this was outweighed by the significant and legitimate public purpose of the statute.
"This victory confirms that an employer cannot make a change to any provision of a contract that contains a forum-selection clause without triggering Section 925," Silvers said. "An employer cannot get around this statute by modifying other provisions of the agreement except the forum-selection clause, and then claim that the statute does not apply." This decision is also significant because it confirmed that including modification in the statute closed this potential loophole that Defendant tried to exploit here, Silvers said.
"Hopefully this will help ensure that such forum selection clauses in California go by the wayside, as was intended by the statute."
About Bisnar Chase
Bisnar Chase represents employees' rights and those injured by defective products and acts of negligence. The firm has been featured on a number of popular media outlets including Newsweek, Fox, NBC, and ABC, and is known for its passionate pursuit of results for their clients. Since 1978, Bisnar Chase has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for victims and their families. For more information, please call 800-561-4887 or visit http://www.BestAttorney.com for a free consultation. We are located at 1301 Dove Street #120, Newport Beach, CA 92660.
Source: Bisnar Chase
Filed Under: Business
0 Comments
Latest on EntSun News
- John Duffy Hosts Sister Irene O' Neill, Founder and President, and Kelly Mallon Young
- Heritage at South Brunswick Offers Immediate Townhome Appointments and Special Mortgage Incentive Fast-Moving Sales
- American Made Ivey Abitz Bespoke Clothing Travels for Summer
- NASA Collaborative Agreement for Supply of Thin-Film Solar Tech for Orbital Application to Advance Development of Thin-Film PV Power Beaming: $ASTI
- Exciting New Era of Sports, Entertainment & Gaming Innovation Spotlighted by Rebrand of Expanding AI Driven, Online Fan Engagement Company: SEGG Media
- Service Ninjas Debuts First-of-Its-Kind "Membership" Platform for Home Service Pros
- Bruce In The USA Brings Immersive Bruce Springsteen Celebration to Frederick This October
- BIYA Forecasts 2025 Surge with ¥300M ($41.8 M USD) in Revenue and ¥25M Profit from Cloud Based HR Solutions: Baiya Intl. Group (N A S D A Q: BIYA)
- Paul E. Saperstein Co. Announces Geographic Expansion of Auction Services
- Florida Broker Bent Danholm Featured in the Daily Mail's U.S. Real Estate Coverage
- Robin Launches Legal Intelligence Platform to solve intelligence gap in Fortune 500 legal teams
- Melissa B. Releases Digitally Independent: Empowering Music Artists with AI and Brand Strategy
- Mental: Elderly Abuse a Documentary
- Consumer Accountability Alliance Issues Formal Notice Alleging Proximate Liability for Medical Harm
- Rising to New Heights in the Mile High City with Destination: Scientology, Denver
- The City's Largest and Most Elegant Dinner Party Returns on September 13, 2025
- Utah Metal Fabricator Titan Forge Builds Momentum with Custom Steel Projects and Spiral Staircases
- Jason Koch: Pioneering the Future of Real Estate Development in New Jersey
- Voting Opens Tonight for the 2025 Spin Awards Honoring Excellence in Christian Gospel Radio
- Introducing LK Blue: The Cool-Girl Denim Brand That's Redefining LA Style Launches E-Commerce