Popular on EntSun
- EMBER™, the Only Standardized System Linking Workforce Identity to Growth, Appoints Global Brand Visionary Bret Sanford-Chung to Board of Directors - 1309
- The 2025 "Aizu Festival" in Aizu Wakamatsu City will be held September 19–21 - 1227
- University Rankings Index Announces 2025 Rankings of the Top US Online Universities - 1196
- Perception meets learning: Museum of Illusions Orlando offers educational field trips - 1178
- iPOP Alum Ava Jean lands role in the reboot of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" - 1131
- Titus Announces Triumphant Return to the Gospel Music Industry - 1114
- Boston Industrial Solutions Launches Citrine® CAL-685 Silicone Primer - 1047
- Hoki Poki Studio by Sadhana Bruçó Unveils New Artistic Feature: Denim as a Canvas for Storytelling - 597
- Voice Of Rainbow Brite, Bettina Bush Debuts First Solo Children's Album "Once Upon A Rainbow" - 501
- Mount Dora Frida Festival: Feel the Beat, See the Color Sat Sept 27 - 492
China won't save the global economy this time
EntSun News/10823551
Bad assumptions make for bad policies and poor investment decisions. One big one we need to test is the notion that China's post-pandemic economy is going to rescue the world.That assumption is flavouring much of the Australian debate on our economic future—and on how we should deal with trade threats from Beijing.To get more latest china economy news, you can visit shine news official website.
An example is talking about $600 million in 'lost' exports to China because of the 80% tariff Beijing has imposed on Australian barley. That $600 million figure is an illusion. It's based on the amount of barley exported in 2019, which was driven mainly by sales of high-end barley used in brewing beer. And here's the problem with that: Chinese consumer demand, especially among the middle class, has plummeted as a result of the pandemic, so prices and sales volumes of many commodities are falling. This is true of Chilean grapes, Egyptian oranges and Peruvian avocados, and it will probably also be true over coming weeks and months of 'luxury' commodities bought by China's middle class—wine is an example that comes to mind. So, the economics of the pandemic tells us that market projections and sales data from before Covid-19 for a wide range of products—including barley—are not guides to the future. On top of this, businesses must now take into account the realised risk of coercive action by the Chinese government, with barley as Exhibit A.
Back in the heady economic times of mid-2019, McKinsey Global Institute forecast a buoyant consumer market in China 'on the back of rising incomes', mainly of the middle class. That's not the situation now, so resetting our assumptions is critical. The global financial crisis started in the US and was centred on the international finance system. The Chinese economy was affected by it, but China was not the source of the crisis. And China's economy and state-driven finance system were in a position to pump-prime their own development and so suck in imports. After a brief, sharp downturn in 2008, China's economy grew by 8.7% in 2009 and 10.4% in 2010. Fed by large volumes of our competitively priced iron ore, gas, coal, food and services, China's economy, along with Australia's, emerged in comparatively good health.
More on EntSun News
This time it's different. China is the place where the pandemic began and, for all the triumphalism from Beijing, the Chinese economy is in no way back in business. The stimulus tools available during the GFC—cheap money from a shadow finance sector and large-scale infrastructure spending—don't make sense this time because the finance sector is now its own source of risk, and infrastructure oversupply won't deliver a healthy economy. More significantly, Chinese consumer confidence is broken. Just like in other countries, government policy is big in China, but consumers' perceptions of their economic future are bigger.
Chinese consumers know that China's two sources of growth—domestic consumption and global exports—are both undercut by the pandemic. Along with that, the pressures to alleviate poverty and avoid social unrest are growing. Managing them will drag on growth. The Economist reports that only about a quarter of China's 800-million-strong workforce is eligible for unemployment insurance, and the number of people left unemployed by the pandemic is perhaps as much as 80 million—nearly 20% of urban workers. Much of the suffering is concentrated in China's 300 million 'migrant workers'—Chinese citizens living and working in locations different to their place of registration. Under Beijing's rules, they are not entitled to government benefits. Social unrest is an abiding and primary concern for the Chinese Communist Party because it fears the political change it could drive. It's the reason Beijing spends more on internal security forces than on the Chinese military.
It's also why Beijing continues to repress protests in Hong Kong: political freedom there is dangerous for the CCP on the mainland. These anxieties will be heightened by the suffering of migrant workers. So, Beijing has to manage unemployment, along with reluctant consumers and an economy dislocated by the pandemic and continuing control measures. It's not surprising, then, to find Chairman Xi Jinping doing 'self-inspection' tours urging industry and commerce to get the economy up and running. Given the troubled economy, he's been talking up poverty alleviation and talking down his previous goal of achieving an affluent society. He has also been pushing to reduce 'dependence on traditional industries like coal and steel'.
More on EntSun News
China is not the global growth engine it was projected to be in many businesses' plans. That raises an urgent question about the extent to which businesses in any sector—not just tourism, tertiary education, beef, barley, wine, and even iron ore and coal—should risk their futures by banking on secure, growing markets in China. The very real business risk from coercive Chinese government behaviour is an additional element that makes this something every company director and shareholder is right to question and test. The optimal balance for Australian trading sectors will take time to establish. Like with the China market, developing a greater share in other global markets will take time and commitment.But it's smart not to fall into the dangerous and lazy trap of thinking that the economic path out of Covid-19 is the same as it was for the GFC and leads through Beijing.
None of this means 'shutting the gate in respect of China', as some of the more outlandish characterisations of the debate have claimed. There's still a foundation of mutual benefit in the economic relationship. And Beijing's concern around the political implications of its domestic economic weakness may moderate its willingness to inflict further self-harm through further coercion of Australian and other businesses.
We need to be clear-headed when making fundamental economic decisions and bring to those decisions an understanding of the actual economic pressures China faces, as well as of the Chinese government's role and nature. The good news is this seems to be the path that Prime Minister Scott Morrison is on, with the support of the federal Labor Party. The Australian public understands this, although some business leaders and state politicians have some catching up to do.
An example is talking about $600 million in 'lost' exports to China because of the 80% tariff Beijing has imposed on Australian barley. That $600 million figure is an illusion. It's based on the amount of barley exported in 2019, which was driven mainly by sales of high-end barley used in brewing beer. And here's the problem with that: Chinese consumer demand, especially among the middle class, has plummeted as a result of the pandemic, so prices and sales volumes of many commodities are falling. This is true of Chilean grapes, Egyptian oranges and Peruvian avocados, and it will probably also be true over coming weeks and months of 'luxury' commodities bought by China's middle class—wine is an example that comes to mind. So, the economics of the pandemic tells us that market projections and sales data from before Covid-19 for a wide range of products—including barley—are not guides to the future. On top of this, businesses must now take into account the realised risk of coercive action by the Chinese government, with barley as Exhibit A.
Back in the heady economic times of mid-2019, McKinsey Global Institute forecast a buoyant consumer market in China 'on the back of rising incomes', mainly of the middle class. That's not the situation now, so resetting our assumptions is critical. The global financial crisis started in the US and was centred on the international finance system. The Chinese economy was affected by it, but China was not the source of the crisis. And China's economy and state-driven finance system were in a position to pump-prime their own development and so suck in imports. After a brief, sharp downturn in 2008, China's economy grew by 8.7% in 2009 and 10.4% in 2010. Fed by large volumes of our competitively priced iron ore, gas, coal, food and services, China's economy, along with Australia's, emerged in comparatively good health.
More on EntSun News
- Agemin Unveils Breakthrough AI Model for Biometric Age Estimation, Setting New Standards in Online Child Safety
- Strategic Partnerships with Defiant Space Corp and Emtel Energy USA Powerfully Enhance Solar Tech Leader with NASA Agreements: Ascent Solar $ASTI
- 120% Revenue Surge with Four Straight Profitable Quarters Signal a Breakout in the Multi-Billion Dollar Homebuilding Market: Innovative Designs $IVDN
- Leading Venture Capital Firms Recognize Wzzph Exchange's Technical Architecture and Security Framework as Industry Benchmark
- Studio Dia'ani Launches AI-Powered Creative Platform for Content Creators and Entrepreneurs
This time it's different. China is the place where the pandemic began and, for all the triumphalism from Beijing, the Chinese economy is in no way back in business. The stimulus tools available during the GFC—cheap money from a shadow finance sector and large-scale infrastructure spending—don't make sense this time because the finance sector is now its own source of risk, and infrastructure oversupply won't deliver a healthy economy. More significantly, Chinese consumer confidence is broken. Just like in other countries, government policy is big in China, but consumers' perceptions of their economic future are bigger.
Chinese consumers know that China's two sources of growth—domestic consumption and global exports—are both undercut by the pandemic. Along with that, the pressures to alleviate poverty and avoid social unrest are growing. Managing them will drag on growth. The Economist reports that only about a quarter of China's 800-million-strong workforce is eligible for unemployment insurance, and the number of people left unemployed by the pandemic is perhaps as much as 80 million—nearly 20% of urban workers. Much of the suffering is concentrated in China's 300 million 'migrant workers'—Chinese citizens living and working in locations different to their place of registration. Under Beijing's rules, they are not entitled to government benefits. Social unrest is an abiding and primary concern for the Chinese Communist Party because it fears the political change it could drive. It's the reason Beijing spends more on internal security forces than on the Chinese military.
It's also why Beijing continues to repress protests in Hong Kong: political freedom there is dangerous for the CCP on the mainland. These anxieties will be heightened by the suffering of migrant workers. So, Beijing has to manage unemployment, along with reluctant consumers and an economy dislocated by the pandemic and continuing control measures. It's not surprising, then, to find Chairman Xi Jinping doing 'self-inspection' tours urging industry and commerce to get the economy up and running. Given the troubled economy, he's been talking up poverty alleviation and talking down his previous goal of achieving an affluent society. He has also been pushing to reduce 'dependence on traditional industries like coal and steel'.
More on EntSun News
- DivX Unveils Major DivX Software Update: Seamless Video Sharing and Customizable Playback Now Available
- Nespolo Mechanical Helps New Mexico Families Save Thousands on Heating Costs This Fall
- Leading Digital Finance Platform YNQTL Launches Revolutionary Web3 Digital Asset Trading Platform
- IDCXS Addresses Crypto Trading Pain Points with 2 Million TPS Processing and Multi-Layer Security Architecture
- Bridging Traditional Finance and Web3 Innovation: BLFCW Announces Strategic Vision for Regulated Web3 Economy
China is not the global growth engine it was projected to be in many businesses' plans. That raises an urgent question about the extent to which businesses in any sector—not just tourism, tertiary education, beef, barley, wine, and even iron ore and coal—should risk their futures by banking on secure, growing markets in China. The very real business risk from coercive Chinese government behaviour is an additional element that makes this something every company director and shareholder is right to question and test. The optimal balance for Australian trading sectors will take time to establish. Like with the China market, developing a greater share in other global markets will take time and commitment.But it's smart not to fall into the dangerous and lazy trap of thinking that the economic path out of Covid-19 is the same as it was for the GFC and leads through Beijing.
None of this means 'shutting the gate in respect of China', as some of the more outlandish characterisations of the debate have claimed. There's still a foundation of mutual benefit in the economic relationship. And Beijing's concern around the political implications of its domestic economic weakness may moderate its willingness to inflict further self-harm through further coercion of Australian and other businesses.
We need to be clear-headed when making fundamental economic decisions and bring to those decisions an understanding of the actual economic pressures China faces, as well as of the Chinese government's role and nature. The good news is this seems to be the path that Prime Minister Scott Morrison is on, with the support of the federal Labor Party. The Australian public understands this, although some business leaders and state politicians have some catching up to do.
0 Comments
Latest on EntSun News
- Dental Surgical Center Accepts Sedation Patients with Medicaid for MD, WV, PA and DC
- Sloan's Lake Dental Launches New Website to Enhance Patient Experience and Access to Modern Dental Care
- Only 3 Weeks Left till the Start of the OpenSSL Conference 2025
- ENTOUCH Completes $50 million Funding Round
- New Film from BayView Entertainment Poses the Question, "What if Amelia Earhart Had Lived?"
- Teaming Agreement with Emtel Energy USA to Advance Thin-Film PV Energy Storage Capabilities; NASA agreements for Solar Space Tech; Ascent Solar $ASTI
- Nebuvex Acknowledges Platform "Too Secure" for Anonymous Traders; Institutional Investors Disagree
- From Tokyo to Berlin: FreeTo.Chat Unites Cultures with the World's First Confession VRX — EmojiStream™
- AZETHIO Launches Multi-Million Dollar User Protection Initiative Following Unprecedented Platform Growth
- Matecrypt Observes South American Cryptocurrency Adoption Surge Amid Economic Shifts
- Peachtree Village International Film Festival (PVIFF) Celebrates 20th Anniversary
- Assent Uncovers Over 695 Unique PFAS Across Global Supply Chains as Regulations Increase
- Cryptocurrency Quarterly Trading Volume Surpasses $15 Trillion Record High as BrazilNex Acknowledges Industry 'Growing Pains' Amid Market Speculation
- AHRFD Initiates Legal Proceedings Against Anwalt.de for Publishing Defamatory and False Content
- New Analysis Reveals the Complex Forces Driving the 'Great Human Reshuffle'
- Elevate Unveils GroundComm X30 at 2025 International GSE Expo in Las Vegas
- "Flathead Lake: A Montana Album" Captures the Spirit of Glacier National Park and the Rockies in Immersive Dolby Atmos
- Meet Donna L. Quesinberry: Angelic Realms and Transcendent Verse
- How DonnaInk Elevates Indie Authors with Editorial Precision
- NEW power supply release from Kepco Dynatronix - HSP Advanced