Popular on EntSun
- Actor Phillip Steward Featured on The Industry Podcast with James Winborn - 148
- VENUS Goes Live on CATEX Exchange As UK Financial Ltd Activates The Premier Division Of The Maya Meme's League - 130
- Elder Abuse Case Against Healthy Traditions Owner Raises Questions As To The Dire Reality Of Abuse Against The Last Of The Baby Boomers - 126
- Nieuwe standaard in webdesign: Professionele website laten maken voor het MKB vanaf €249 door Websitepioniers - 116
- Progressive Dental & The Closing Institute Partner with Zest Dental Solutions to Elevate Full-Arch Growth and Patient Outcomes - 114
- Notice: Hrm Queen Laurence I Assumes Crown Control & $317q Fund. 3bn Unopoly Shares Settled. Requisition Of Buckingham Palace & Windsor Castle Final - 109
- Elklook Launches Special March 8th Women's Day Event - 108
- Arcuri Group Announces Long‑Term Partnership with WakeMed Health & Hospitals to Deliver Situational Awareness and De‑escalation Training - 107
- New Book Warring From the Standpoint of the Throne Room Calls Believers to Pray From Victory - 104
- Tobu Group's "T-home Series" of Accommodations in Tokyo Just Opened "T-home KEI." - 102
China won't save the global economy this time
EntSun News/10823551
Bad assumptions make for bad policies and poor investment decisions. One big one we need to test is the notion that China's post-pandemic economy is going to rescue the world.That assumption is flavouring much of the Australian debate on our economic future—and on how we should deal with trade threats from Beijing.To get more latest china economy news, you can visit shine news official website.
An example is talking about $600 million in 'lost' exports to China because of the 80% tariff Beijing has imposed on Australian barley. That $600 million figure is an illusion. It's based on the amount of barley exported in 2019, which was driven mainly by sales of high-end barley used in brewing beer. And here's the problem with that: Chinese consumer demand, especially among the middle class, has plummeted as a result of the pandemic, so prices and sales volumes of many commodities are falling. This is true of Chilean grapes, Egyptian oranges and Peruvian avocados, and it will probably also be true over coming weeks and months of 'luxury' commodities bought by China's middle class—wine is an example that comes to mind. So, the economics of the pandemic tells us that market projections and sales data from before Covid-19 for a wide range of products—including barley—are not guides to the future. On top of this, businesses must now take into account the realised risk of coercive action by the Chinese government, with barley as Exhibit A.
Back in the heady economic times of mid-2019, McKinsey Global Institute forecast a buoyant consumer market in China 'on the back of rising incomes', mainly of the middle class. That's not the situation now, so resetting our assumptions is critical. The global financial crisis started in the US and was centred on the international finance system. The Chinese economy was affected by it, but China was not the source of the crisis. And China's economy and state-driven finance system were in a position to pump-prime their own development and so suck in imports. After a brief, sharp downturn in 2008, China's economy grew by 8.7% in 2009 and 10.4% in 2010. Fed by large volumes of our competitively priced iron ore, gas, coal, food and services, China's economy, along with Australia's, emerged in comparatively good health.
More on EntSun News
This time it's different. China is the place where the pandemic began and, for all the triumphalism from Beijing, the Chinese economy is in no way back in business. The stimulus tools available during the GFC—cheap money from a shadow finance sector and large-scale infrastructure spending—don't make sense this time because the finance sector is now its own source of risk, and infrastructure oversupply won't deliver a healthy economy. More significantly, Chinese consumer confidence is broken. Just like in other countries, government policy is big in China, but consumers' perceptions of their economic future are bigger.
Chinese consumers know that China's two sources of growth—domestic consumption and global exports—are both undercut by the pandemic. Along with that, the pressures to alleviate poverty and avoid social unrest are growing. Managing them will drag on growth. The Economist reports that only about a quarter of China's 800-million-strong workforce is eligible for unemployment insurance, and the number of people left unemployed by the pandemic is perhaps as much as 80 million—nearly 20% of urban workers. Much of the suffering is concentrated in China's 300 million 'migrant workers'—Chinese citizens living and working in locations different to their place of registration. Under Beijing's rules, they are not entitled to government benefits. Social unrest is an abiding and primary concern for the Chinese Communist Party because it fears the political change it could drive. It's the reason Beijing spends more on internal security forces than on the Chinese military.
It's also why Beijing continues to repress protests in Hong Kong: political freedom there is dangerous for the CCP on the mainland. These anxieties will be heightened by the suffering of migrant workers. So, Beijing has to manage unemployment, along with reluctant consumers and an economy dislocated by the pandemic and continuing control measures. It's not surprising, then, to find Chairman Xi Jinping doing 'self-inspection' tours urging industry and commerce to get the economy up and running. Given the troubled economy, he's been talking up poverty alleviation and talking down his previous goal of achieving an affluent society. He has also been pushing to reduce 'dependence on traditional industries like coal and steel'.
More on EntSun News
China is not the global growth engine it was projected to be in many businesses' plans. That raises an urgent question about the extent to which businesses in any sector—not just tourism, tertiary education, beef, barley, wine, and even iron ore and coal—should risk their futures by banking on secure, growing markets in China. The very real business risk from coercive Chinese government behaviour is an additional element that makes this something every company director and shareholder is right to question and test. The optimal balance for Australian trading sectors will take time to establish. Like with the China market, developing a greater share in other global markets will take time and commitment.But it's smart not to fall into the dangerous and lazy trap of thinking that the economic path out of Covid-19 is the same as it was for the GFC and leads through Beijing.
None of this means 'shutting the gate in respect of China', as some of the more outlandish characterisations of the debate have claimed. There's still a foundation of mutual benefit in the economic relationship. And Beijing's concern around the political implications of its domestic economic weakness may moderate its willingness to inflict further self-harm through further coercion of Australian and other businesses.
We need to be clear-headed when making fundamental economic decisions and bring to those decisions an understanding of the actual economic pressures China faces, as well as of the Chinese government's role and nature. The good news is this seems to be the path that Prime Minister Scott Morrison is on, with the support of the federal Labor Party. The Australian public understands this, although some business leaders and state politicians have some catching up to do.
An example is talking about $600 million in 'lost' exports to China because of the 80% tariff Beijing has imposed on Australian barley. That $600 million figure is an illusion. It's based on the amount of barley exported in 2019, which was driven mainly by sales of high-end barley used in brewing beer. And here's the problem with that: Chinese consumer demand, especially among the middle class, has plummeted as a result of the pandemic, so prices and sales volumes of many commodities are falling. This is true of Chilean grapes, Egyptian oranges and Peruvian avocados, and it will probably also be true over coming weeks and months of 'luxury' commodities bought by China's middle class—wine is an example that comes to mind. So, the economics of the pandemic tells us that market projections and sales data from before Covid-19 for a wide range of products—including barley—are not guides to the future. On top of this, businesses must now take into account the realised risk of coercive action by the Chinese government, with barley as Exhibit A.
Back in the heady economic times of mid-2019, McKinsey Global Institute forecast a buoyant consumer market in China 'on the back of rising incomes', mainly of the middle class. That's not the situation now, so resetting our assumptions is critical. The global financial crisis started in the US and was centred on the international finance system. The Chinese economy was affected by it, but China was not the source of the crisis. And China's economy and state-driven finance system were in a position to pump-prime their own development and so suck in imports. After a brief, sharp downturn in 2008, China's economy grew by 8.7% in 2009 and 10.4% in 2010. Fed by large volumes of our competitively priced iron ore, gas, coal, food and services, China's economy, along with Australia's, emerged in comparatively good health.
More on EntSun News
- No Limit East Announces Salute U P (Master P Tribute) Releasing March 29, 2026
- No Limit East Announces "Master P Tribute"
- Independent Country Artist Kirk Menard Announces New Album Release
- Legal Powerhouses, Dance Drama, and Romance: Meet the New Platform Debuting This April
- Homeowner Prep Announces Strategic Language Shift: Replacing "Renters" with "Future Homeowners" to Inspire Wealth-Building Mindsets
This time it's different. China is the place where the pandemic began and, for all the triumphalism from Beijing, the Chinese economy is in no way back in business. The stimulus tools available during the GFC—cheap money from a shadow finance sector and large-scale infrastructure spending—don't make sense this time because the finance sector is now its own source of risk, and infrastructure oversupply won't deliver a healthy economy. More significantly, Chinese consumer confidence is broken. Just like in other countries, government policy is big in China, but consumers' perceptions of their economic future are bigger.
Chinese consumers know that China's two sources of growth—domestic consumption and global exports—are both undercut by the pandemic. Along with that, the pressures to alleviate poverty and avoid social unrest are growing. Managing them will drag on growth. The Economist reports that only about a quarter of China's 800-million-strong workforce is eligible for unemployment insurance, and the number of people left unemployed by the pandemic is perhaps as much as 80 million—nearly 20% of urban workers. Much of the suffering is concentrated in China's 300 million 'migrant workers'—Chinese citizens living and working in locations different to their place of registration. Under Beijing's rules, they are not entitled to government benefits. Social unrest is an abiding and primary concern for the Chinese Communist Party because it fears the political change it could drive. It's the reason Beijing spends more on internal security forces than on the Chinese military.
It's also why Beijing continues to repress protests in Hong Kong: political freedom there is dangerous for the CCP on the mainland. These anxieties will be heightened by the suffering of migrant workers. So, Beijing has to manage unemployment, along with reluctant consumers and an economy dislocated by the pandemic and continuing control measures. It's not surprising, then, to find Chairman Xi Jinping doing 'self-inspection' tours urging industry and commerce to get the economy up and running. Given the troubled economy, he's been talking up poverty alleviation and talking down his previous goal of achieving an affluent society. He has also been pushing to reduce 'dependence on traditional industries like coal and steel'.
More on EntSun News
- LiposoMore™ Redefines Bioavailability: Joyful Nutritional Launches High-Performance Liposomal Vitamin C and Iron for the Global Supplement Market
- GDE Tree Services Expands Operations into Sydney, NSW
- Tuckwell Machinery Expands CNC Range to Support Australian Cabinet Makers
- The Inner Power of Emotional Self-Leadership
- Dr. Nadene Rose Shares the Secret to True Success: Faith, Obedience, and Divine Purpose
China is not the global growth engine it was projected to be in many businesses' plans. That raises an urgent question about the extent to which businesses in any sector—not just tourism, tertiary education, beef, barley, wine, and even iron ore and coal—should risk their futures by banking on secure, growing markets in China. The very real business risk from coercive Chinese government behaviour is an additional element that makes this something every company director and shareholder is right to question and test. The optimal balance for Australian trading sectors will take time to establish. Like with the China market, developing a greater share in other global markets will take time and commitment.But it's smart not to fall into the dangerous and lazy trap of thinking that the economic path out of Covid-19 is the same as it was for the GFC and leads through Beijing.
None of this means 'shutting the gate in respect of China', as some of the more outlandish characterisations of the debate have claimed. There's still a foundation of mutual benefit in the economic relationship. And Beijing's concern around the political implications of its domestic economic weakness may moderate its willingness to inflict further self-harm through further coercion of Australian and other businesses.
We need to be clear-headed when making fundamental economic decisions and bring to those decisions an understanding of the actual economic pressures China faces, as well as of the Chinese government's role and nature. The good news is this seems to be the path that Prime Minister Scott Morrison is on, with the support of the federal Labor Party. The Australian public understands this, although some business leaders and state politicians have some catching up to do.
0 Comments
Latest on EntSun News
- Newborn Care Network Introduces Clinical Standard to Bridge the Six-Week Postpartum Gap
- Natural Born Clothing Brand Announces "CALM IS A LUXURY" Spring/Summer 2026 Pop-Up Experience
- Former Ad Guy Delivers a Gripping Political Thriller "Balance of Evil" That Explores Power, Betrayal, and Corruption
- The AAA Metamorphosis: How Global Gaming Is Redefining Production Standards
- Monexplora Explains the Options Mechanics Behind March's Tech Selloff and VIX Surge
- The Podcast Built From a Father's Worst Conversation With His Son
- CarolinaRedd.com Relaunches with Fully Digitized Art Portfolio Showcasing Rapper, Actress, Model
- Larry R. Wasion Highlights Jump Gate I: Time Chair. The Opening Novel in His Expansive Science Fiction Series
- New Book Reveals The Science Of Predictions
- Compliance Alert: Maryland, Texas Regulate Use of Artificial Intelligence in Utilization Reviews
- Colony Ridge Communities Celebrates Successful Soccer Season Kickoff with Families and Youth
- Billy Bob Thornton & The Boxmasters Coming to The Eichelberger Performing Arts Center This August
- Harlem Globetrotters & Keepsake Trading Cards Launch Centennial Trading Card Collection
- Colette Barris's Open Letter To Revolt's Detavio Samuels 'The BlackPrint' Interview Of Kenya Barris
- NYC Composer/Educator Launches Debut Children's Book to Fantastic Reviews
- EFA Announces 2026 Editorial Rate Chart
- Red5 Taps PubNub to Power the Next Era of Real-Time Interactive Streaming
- SeeVideo.dance Goes Live: Dual-Engine AI Video Studio Brings Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3.0 to Creative Professionals
- Shoutout Joseph Neibich aka Nybyk
- Meet Joseph Neibich aka Joseph Nybyk of Beachwood Canyon